You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Wolbachia detection in insects through LAMP: loop mediated isothermal amplification
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Parasites & Vectors, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1756-3305-7-228 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniela da Silva Gonçalves, Anna Paula Alvim Cassimiro, Caroline Dantas de Oliveira, Nilton Barnabé Rodrigues, Luciano Andrade Moreira |
| Abstract |
The bacterium Wolbachia is a promising agent for the biological control of vector-borne diseases as some strains have the ability to block the transmission of key human disease-causing pathogens. Fast, accurate and inexpensive methods of differentiating between infected and uninfected insects will be of critical importance as field-based trials of Wolbachia-based bio-control become increasingly common. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Czechia | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Madagascar | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 39 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 30% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 6 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 50% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 16% |
| Engineering | 2 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2014.
All research outputs
#18,838,150
of 23,343,453 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#4,314
of 5,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,175
of 228,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#31
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,343,453 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,558 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.