You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Positive practice environments influence job satisfaction of primary health care clinic nursing managers in two South African provinces
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Human Resources for Health, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1478-4491-12-27 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pascalia Ozida Munyewende, Laetitia Charmaine Rispel, Tobias Chirwa |
| Abstract |
Nurses constitute the majority of the health workforce in South Africa and they play a major role in providing primary health care (PHC) services. Job satisfaction influences nurse retention and successful implementation of health system reforms. This study was conducted in light of renewed government commitment to reforms at the PHC level, and to contribute to the development of solutions to the challenges faced by the South African nursing workforce. The objective of the study was to determine overall job satisfaction of PHC clinic nursing managers and the predictors of their job satisfaction in two South African provinces. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Kenya | 1 | 25% |
| South Africa | 1 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 310 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Romania | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 306 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 55 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 26 | 8% |
| Researcher | 24 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 8% |
| Other | 63 | 20% |
| Unknown | 85 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 79 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 24 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 22 | 7% |
| Psychology | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 29 | 9% |
| Unknown | 89 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2014.
All research outputs
#14,784,344
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
#971
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,169
of 241,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
#21
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,490 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.