↓ Skip to main content

Relation between mean arterial pressure and renal function in the early phase of shock: a prospective, explorative cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
127 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
159 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Relation between mean arterial pressure and renal function in the early phase of shock: a prospective, explorative cohort study
Published in
Critical Care, June 2011
DOI 10.1186/cc10253
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julie Badin, Thierry Boulain, Stephan Ehrmann, Marie Skarzynski, Anne Bretagnol, Jennifer Buret, Dalila Benzekri-Lefevre, Emmanuelle Mercier, Isabelle Runge, Denis Garot, Armelle Mathonnet, Pierre-François Dequin, Dominique Perrotin

Abstract

Because of disturbed renal autoregulation, patients experiencing hypotension-induced renal insult might need higher levels of mean arterial pressure (MAP) than the 65 mmHg recommended level in order to avoid the progression of acute kidney insufficiency (AKI).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
France 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Unknown 153 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 27 17%
Researcher 22 14%
Student > Postgraduate 22 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 9%
Student > Master 14 9%
Other 37 23%
Unknown 22 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 116 73%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Arts and Humanities 3 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 1%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 1%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 23 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,345,124
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,157
of 6,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,448
of 123,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#1
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,558 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,458 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.