↓ Skip to main content

Anti-malarial drug quality in Lagos and Accra - a comparison of various quality assessments

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Anti-malarial drug quality in Lagos and Accra - a comparison of various quality assessments
Published in
Malaria Journal, June 2010
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-9-157
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roger Bate, Kimberly Hess

Abstract

Two major cities in West Africa, Accra, the capital of Ghana, and Lagos, the largest city of Nigeria, have significant problems with substandard pharmaceuticals. Both have actively combated the problem in recent years, particularly by screening products on the market using the Global Pharma Health Fund e.V. Minilab protocol. Random sampling of medicines from the two cities at least twice over the past 30 months allows a tentative assessment of whether improvements in drug quality have occurred. Since intelligence provided by investigators indicates that some counterfeit producers may be adapting products to pass Minilab tests, the results are compared with those from a Raman spectrometer and discrepancies are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Nigeria 1 1%
Ghana 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 85 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 18%
Researcher 14 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Other 22 24%
Unknown 9 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 27%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 15 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Other 18 20%
Unknown 15 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2020.
All research outputs
#4,807,205
of 23,924,386 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#1,208
of 5,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,786
of 98,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#8
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,924,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,721 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,093 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.