↓ Skip to main content

Hypertension and type 2 diabetes: What family physicians can do to improve control of blood pressure - an observational study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Primary Care, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hypertension and type 2 diabetes: What family physicians can do to improve control of blood pressure - an observational study
Published in
BMC Primary Care, August 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2296-12-86
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wayne Putnam, Beverley Lawson, Farokh Buhariwalla, Mary Goodfellow, Rose Anne Goodine, Jennifer Hall, Kendrick Lacey, Ian MacDonald, Frederick I Burge, Nandini Natarajan, Ingrid Sketris, Beth Mann, Peggy Dunbar, Kristine Van Aarsen, Marshall S Godwin

Abstract

The prevalence of type 2 diabetes is rising, and most of these patients also have hypertension, substantially increasing the risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The majority of these patients do not reach target blood pressure levels for a wide variety of reasons. When a literature review provided no clear focus for action when patients are not at target, we initiated a study to identify characteristics of patients and providers associated with achieving target BP levels in community-based practice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Argentina 1 1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 1%
Unknown 86 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 14%
Researcher 13 14%
Student > Master 11 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Other 23 26%
Unknown 16 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 12%
Social Sciences 6 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 19 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2011.
All research outputs
#15,169,543
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Primary Care
#1,381
of 2,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,219
of 131,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Primary Care
#17
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,751 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.