You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Randomized clinical trial of the effects of screening and brief intervention for illicit drug use: the life shift/shift gears study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1940-0640-9-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Susan I Woodruff, John D Clapp, Kimberly Eisenberg, Cameron McCabe, Melinda Hohman, Audrey M Shillington, C Beth Sise, Edward M Castillo, Theodore C Chan, Michael J Sise, Joey Gareri |
| Abstract |
Although screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) has shown promise for alcohol use, relatively little is known about its effectiveness for adult illicit drug use. This randomized controlled trial assessed the effectiveness of the SBIRT approach for outcomes related to drug use among patients visiting trauma and emergency departments (EDs) at two large, urban hospitals. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 127 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 18% |
| Unknown | 38 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 25% |
| Psychology | 19 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Unknown | 49 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2018.
All research outputs
#3,200,586
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
#112
of 487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,760
of 240,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 487 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,009 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.