↓ Skip to main content

Identifying solutions to increase participation in physical activity interventions within a socio-economically disadvantaged community: a qualitative study

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
21 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
179 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identifying solutions to increase participation in physical activity interventions within a socio-economically disadvantaged community: a qualitative study
Published in
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-11-68
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claire L Cleland, Ruth F Hunter, Mark A Tully, David Scott, Frank Kee, Michael Donnelly, Lindsay Prior, Margaret E Cupples

Abstract

There is an urgent need to increase population levels of physical activity, particularly amongst those who are socio-economically disadvantaged. Multiple factors influence physical activity behaviour but the generalisability of current evidence to such 'hard-to-reach' population subgroups is limited by difficulties in recruiting them into studies. Also, rigorous qualitative studies of lay perceptions and perceptions of community leaders about public health efforts to increase physical activity are sparse. We sought to explore, within a socio-economically disadvantaged community, residents' and community leaders' perceptions of physical activity (PA) interventions and issues regarding their implementation, in order to improve understanding of needs, expectations, and social/environmental factors relevant to future interventions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 174 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 18%
Student > Master 29 16%
Researcher 25 14%
Student > Bachelor 16 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Other 24 13%
Unknown 40 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 14%
Social Sciences 23 13%
Psychology 14 8%
Sports and Recreations 11 6%
Other 21 12%
Unknown 46 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2014.
All research outputs
#1,973,919
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#755
of 1,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,550
of 227,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#6
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,974 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,872 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.