You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Clinical malaria among pregnant women on combined insecticide treated nets (ITNs) and intermittent preventive treatment (IPTp) with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine in Yaounde, Cameroon
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Women's Health, May 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6874-14-68 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Robinson Enow Mbu, William Ako Takang, Hortence Jeanne Fouedjio, Florent Ymele Fouelifack, Florence Ndikum Tumasang, Rebecca Tonye |
Abstract |
Malaria remains a burden for pregnant women and the under 5. Intermittent preventive treatment of pregnant women (IPTp) for malaria with sulfadoxine - pyrimethamine (SP) has since replaced prophylaxis and legislation has been reinforced in the area of insecticide treated mosquito nets (ITNs) in Cameroon. Clinical malaria despite all these measures remains a problem. We compared the socio-obstetrical characteristics of women who developed clinical malaria and those who did not though in the same regimen. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Burkina Faso | 1 | 1% |
Belgium | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 89 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 27 | 29% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 15% |
Researcher | 9 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
Other | 16 | 17% |
Unknown | 14 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 28% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 11% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 8% |
Other | 10 | 11% |
Unknown | 20 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2014.
All research outputs
#15,200,383
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from BMC Women's Health
#1,254
of 1,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,007
of 228,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Women's Health
#17
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,952 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,747 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.