You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Novel occupational therapy interventions may improve quality of life in older adults with dementia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Archives of Medicine, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1755-7682-7-26 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Prakash Kumar, Sarvada Chandra Tiwari, Ashish Goel, Vishnubhatla Sreenivas, Nand Kumar, Rakesh Kumar Tripathi, Vineet Gupta, Aparajit Ballave Dey |
| Abstract |
Dementia is a major health problem in advancing age with no definitive treatment. Occupational therapy interventions are recognized strategies in treatment of dementia. Quality of life (QOL) assessment has been reliably used as an objective index of an individual's well being pertaining to interventions in dementia. A randomized controlled trial was conducted to study the effects of a novel occupational therapy program in improving QOL of subjects having mild to moderate dementia. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 33% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 160 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 29 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Researcher | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 28 | 17% |
| Unknown | 49 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 34 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 17% |
| Psychology | 15 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 10% |
| Unknown | 57 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2015.
All research outputs
#6,443,331
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Archives of Medicine
#27
of 103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,729
of 239,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Archives of Medicine
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,999 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.