↓ Skip to main content

Measuring the healthfulness of food retail stores: variations by store type and neighbourhood deprivation

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Measuring the healthfulness of food retail stores: variations by store type and neighbourhood deprivation
Published in
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-11-69
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christina Black, Georgia Ntani, Hazel Inskip, Cyrus Cooper, Steven Cummins, Graham Moon, Janis Baird

Abstract

The consumer nutrition environment has been conceptualised as in-store environmental factors that influence food shopping habits. More healthful in-store environments could be characterised as those which promote healthful food choices such as selling good quality healthy foods or placing them in prominent locations to prompt purchasing. Research measuring the full-range of in-store environmental factors concurrently is limited.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 146 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 17%
Student > Master 23 15%
Student > Bachelor 10 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 22 15%
Unknown 34 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 16%
Social Sciences 24 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 10 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 5%
Other 35 23%
Unknown 37 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2016.
All research outputs
#6,154,798
of 23,313,051 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#1,446
of 1,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,480
of 227,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#21
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,313,051 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,958 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.8. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.