You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Native T1-mapping detects the location, extent and patterns of acute myocarditis without the need for gadolinium contrast agents
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1532-429x-16-36 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vanessa M Ferreira, Stefan K Piechnik, Erica Dall’Armellina, Theodoros D Karamitsos, Jane M Francis, Ntobeko Ntusi, Cameron Holloway, Robin P Choudhury, Attila Kardos, Matthew D Robson, Matthias G Friedrich, Stefan Neubauer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 14% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Brazil | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 5% |
| Thailand | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 71% |
| Scientists | 4 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 161 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 31 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 14% |
| Other | 20 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 28 | 17% |
| Unknown | 37 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 88 | 54% |
| Engineering | 6 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Unknown | 51 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,765,880
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#138
of 1,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,535
of 240,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#2
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,388 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.