↓ Skip to main content

Six weeks of home enteral nutrition versus standard care after esophagectomy or total gastrectomy for cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Six weeks of home enteral nutrition versus standard care after esophagectomy or total gastrectomy for cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-15-187
Pubmed ID
Authors

David J Bowrey, Melanie Baker, Vanessa Halliday, Anne L Thomas, Ruth Pulikottil-Jacob, Karen Smith

Abstract

Each year approximately 3000 patients in the United Kingdom undergo surgery for esophagogastric cancer. Jejunostomy feeding tubes, placed at the time of surgery for early postoperative nutrition, have been shown to have a positive impact on clinical outcomes in the short term. Whether feeding out of hospital is of benefit is unknown. Local experience has identified that between 15 and 20% of patients required 'rescue' jejunostomy feeding for nutritional problems and weight loss while at home. This weight loss and poor nutrition may contribute to the detrimental effect on the overall quality of life (QoL) reported in these patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 136 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 17%
Student > Bachelor 16 12%
Other 15 11%
Researcher 12 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 8%
Other 24 18%
Unknown 36 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 14%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 3%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Psychology 4 3%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 45 33%