↓ Skip to main content

Biological age and tempos of aging in women over 60 in connection with their morphofunctional characteristics

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Physiological Anthropology, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biological age and tempos of aging in women over 60 in connection with their morphofunctional characteristics
Published in
Journal of Physiological Anthropology, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/1880-6805-33-12
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marina Negasheva, Natalia Lapshina, Rostislav Okushko, Elena Godina

Abstract

The study of aging processes and the changes in morphological, physiological, and functional characteristics that are associated with aging is of great interest not only for researchers, but also for the general public. The aim of the present paper is to study the biological age and tempos of aging in women older than 60 years, including long-lived females (over 90-years-old), and their associations with morphofunctional characteristics.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 4%
Colombia 1 4%
Unknown 23 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 24%
Researcher 3 12%
Professor 2 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 5 20%
Unknown 5 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 20%
Psychology 3 12%
Sports and Recreations 3 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Other 5 20%
Unknown 5 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2014.
All research outputs
#19,944,994
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Physiological Anthropology
#327
of 451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,912
of 240,998 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Physiological Anthropology
#9
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 451 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.4. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,998 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.