You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Can an e-learning course improve nursing care for older people at risk of delirium: a stepped wedge cluster randomised trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Geriatrics, May 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2318-14-69 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lotte van de Steeg, Roelie IJkema, Maaike Langelaan, Cordula Wagner |
Abstract |
Delirium occurs frequently in older hospitalised patients and is associated with several adverse outcomes. Ignorance among healthcare professionals and a failure to recognise patients suffering from delirium have been identified as the possible causes of poor care. The objective of the study was to determine whether e-learning can be an effective means of improving implementation of a quality improvement project in delirium care. This project aims primarily at improving the early recognition of older patients who are at risk of delirium. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 6 | 43% |
Canada | 2 | 14% |
Switzerland | 2 | 14% |
United States | 1 | 7% |
Australia | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 2 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 57% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 29% |
Scientists | 2 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 143 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 19 | 13% |
Researcher | 15 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 15 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 9% |
Lecturer | 9 | 6% |
Other | 31 | 21% |
Unknown | 45 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 30% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 28 | 19% |
Social Sciences | 9 | 6% |
Psychology | 6 | 4% |
Computer Science | 4 | 3% |
Other | 11 | 7% |
Unknown | 45 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2015.
All research outputs
#4,553,272
of 25,299,129 outputs
Outputs from BMC Geriatrics
#1,207
of 3,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,327
of 233,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Geriatrics
#8
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,299,129 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,620 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,381 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.