You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
‘To prone or not to prone’ in severe ARDS: questions answered, but others remain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc13893 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Seema S Tekwani, Raghavan Murugan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 44% |
| Kuwait | 1 | 6% |
| South Africa | 1 | 6% |
| Japan | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 44% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 31% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 19% |
| Scientists | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 48 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 12% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 24% |
| Unknown | 14 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 59% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 15 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2014.
All research outputs
#3,343,138
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,692
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,067
of 241,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#40
of 151 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 151 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.