↓ Skip to main content

Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer consensus statement on immunotherapy for the treatment of bladder carcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
twitter
84 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer consensus statement on immunotherapy for the treatment of bladder carcinoma
Published in
Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer, August 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40425-017-0271-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ashish M. Kamat, Joaquim Bellmunt, Matthew D. Galsky, Badrinath R. Konety, Donald L. Lamm, David Langham, Cheryl T. Lee, Matthew I. Milowsky, Michael A. O’Donnell, Peter H. O’Donnell, Daniel P. Petrylak, Padmanee Sharma, Eila C. Skinner, Guru Sonpavde, John A. Taylor, Prasanth Abraham, Jonathan E. Rosenberg

Abstract

The standard of care for most patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is immunotherapy with intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG), which activates the immune system to recognize and destroy malignant cells and has demonstrated durable clinical benefit. Urologic best-practice guidelines and consensus reports have been developed and strengthened based on data on the timing, dose, and duration of therapy from randomized clinical trials, as well as by critical evaluation of criteria for progression. However, these reports have not penetrated the community, and many patients do not receive appropriate therapy. Additionally, several immune checkpoint inhibitors have recently been approved for treatment of metastatic disease. The approval of immune checkpoint blockade for patients with platinum-resistant or -ineligible metastatic bladder cancer has led to considerations of expanded use for both advanced and, potentially, localized disease. To address these issues and others surrounding the appropriate use of immunotherapy for the treatment of bladder cancer, the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) convened a Task Force of experts, including physicians, patient advocates, and nurses, to address issues related to patient selection, toxicity management, clinical endpoints, as well as the combination and sequencing of therapies. Following the standard approach established by the Society for other cancers, a systematic literature review and analysis of data, combined with consensus voting was used to generate guidelines. Here, we provide a consensus statement for the use of immunotherapy in patients with bladder cancer, with plans to update these recommendations as the field progresses.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 84 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 125 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 14%
Other 16 13%
Student > Master 16 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 7%
Other 24 19%
Unknown 32 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 38 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 106. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2024.
All research outputs
#403,359
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer
#85
of 3,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,474
of 326,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer
#2
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,470 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.