You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparing the cultivated cochlear cells derived from neonatal and adult mouse
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Translational Medicine, May 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1479-5876-12-150 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Xiangxin Lou, Youyi Dong, Jing Xie, Xianliu Wang, Liangliang Yang, Masaaki Tokuda, Yanzhong Zhang |
Abstract |
Previous reports showed the presence of limited numbers of stem cells in neonatal murine cochlear sensory epithelia and these cells are progressively lost during the postnatal development. The goal of this study was to investigate whether stem cells can be derived from mature mouse cochleae under suspension culture conditions, and to analyze the expression of the stem cell and inner ear progenitor cell markers in cells dissociated from neonatal and adult mouse organs of Corti. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chile | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 20 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 9 | 43% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 14% |
Other | 2 | 10% |
Student > Master | 2 | 10% |
Professor | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 10% |
Unknown | 2 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 33% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 24% |
Neuroscience | 3 | 14% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 5% |
Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 3 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2014.
All research outputs
#20,230,558
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#3,306
of 3,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,893
of 226,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#38
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,522 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.