You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Setting policy priorities to address eating disorders and weight stigma: views from the field of eating disorders and the US general public
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, May 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-524 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rebecca M Puhl, Dianne Neumark-Sztainer, S Bryn Austin, Joerg Luedicke, Kelly M King |
Abstract |
The prevalence and health consequences of eating disorders and weight stigmatization have prompted increasing discussion of potential policy actions to address these public health issues. The present study aimed to assess support for policy strategies to address eating disorders and weight stigmatization among the general public and relevant health professionals. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 33% |
Australia | 1 | 6% |
Sri Lanka | 1 | 6% |
Philippines | 1 | 6% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 8 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 13 | 72% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 22% |
Scientists | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | <1% |
Czechia | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 198 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 14% |
Student > Master | 26 | 13% |
Researcher | 21 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 21 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 7% |
Other | 35 | 17% |
Unknown | 55 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 49 | 24% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 11% |
Social Sciences | 21 | 10% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
Other | 17 | 8% |
Unknown | 68 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,029,743
of 25,318,210 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,126
of 16,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,799
of 233,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#23
of 292 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,318,210 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,976 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,287 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 292 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.