↓ Skip to main content

Unintentional injury and its prevention in infant: knowledge and self-reported practices of main caregivers

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pediatrics, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Unintentional injury and its prevention in infant: knowledge and self-reported practices of main caregivers
Published in
BMC Pediatrics, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2431-14-132
Pubmed ID
Authors

Siti Nurkamilla Ramdzan, Su May Liew, Ee Ming Khoo

Abstract

Unintentional injuries are the major cause of morbidity and mortality in infants. Prevention of unintentional injuries has been shown to be effective with education. Understanding the level of knowledge and practices of caregivers in infant safety would be useful to identify gaps for improvement.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Singapore 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 74 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 29%
Student > Bachelor 12 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Researcher 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 4%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 13 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 15%
Social Sciences 6 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Psychology 4 5%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 15 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2017.
All research outputs
#14,869,034
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#1,880
of 3,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,342
of 229,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#34
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,143 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,005 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.