↓ Skip to main content

Outcome of hearing preservation related to tumor morphologic analysis in acoustic neuromas treated by gamma knife radiosurgery

Overview of attention for article published in Radiation Oncology, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Outcome of hearing preservation related to tumor morphologic analysis in acoustic neuromas treated by gamma knife radiosurgery
Published in
Radiation Oncology, August 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13014-017-0875-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Szu-Yen Pan, Shih-An Liu, Ming-Hsi Sun, Hsi-Kai Tsou, Shinh-Dung Lee, Yen-Ju Chen, Jason Sheehan, Meei-Ling Sheu, Hung-Chuan Pan

Abstract

Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) is an important part of the neurosurgical armamentarium in the treatment of acoustic neuromas. However, the treatment outcome related to the morphology of the tumor has not been rigorously studied. In this cohort, we evaluated the morphological features of the tumor in the tumor response and neurological outcomes after GKRS. From July 2003 to December 2008, there were 93 cases of acoustic neuromas treated upfront with GKRS with 64 cases with serviceable hearing and 29 cases without serviceable hearing to fulfill the margin dose of 12Gy with at least follow up 5 years. The duration of symptom before GKRS in serviceable /no serviceable hearing was 7.9 ± 1.2 and 15.3 ± 3.1 months (p < 0.001) and associated no-hearing symptom was 70% and 35%, respectively (p < 0.001). There was 81.2% of hearing preservation after GKRS in serviceable hearing group including 27 cases of pear type (84%), 14 of linear type (70%), and 9 cases of sphere type (90%) (p < 0.01); however, there was no case of hearing improvement in the no-serviceable hearing group (0 of 29). There were 85% of patients with decreased tinnitus in serviceable hearing groups as compared to 61.5% of patients in no serviceable hearing group (p < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, the tumor morphology was highly correlated to hearing preservation rate (p < 0.01). In the limited case of this cohort, we found that the tumor morphology and timing of treatment was highly correlated to the rate of hearing preservation. The sphere type of tumor morphology was associated with the best chance of hearing preservation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 21%
Student > Master 4 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Librarian 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 7 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 13%
Engineering 2 8%
Neuroscience 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2017.
All research outputs
#3,152,228
of 22,997,544 outputs
Outputs from Radiation Oncology
#92
of 2,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,911
of 316,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiation Oncology
#3
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,997,544 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,071 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,580 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.