↓ Skip to main content

Methods of data collection and analysis for the economic evaluation alongside a national, multi-centre trial in the UK: Conventional ventilation or ECMO for Severe Adult Respiratory Failure (CESAR)

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Methods of data collection and analysis for the economic evaluation alongside a national, multi-centre trial in the UK: Conventional ventilation or ECMO for Severe Adult Respiratory Failure (CESAR)
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, April 2008
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-8-94
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mariamma M Thalanany, Miranda Mugford, Clare Hibbert, Nicola J Cooper, Ann Truesdale, Steven Robinson, Ravindranath Tiruvoipati, Diana R Elbourne, Giles J Peek, Felicity Clemens, Polly Hardy, Andrew Wilson, The CESAR Trial Group

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 113 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 22%
Other 15 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 9%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Other 30 26%
Unknown 17 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 7%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Engineering 5 4%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 23 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2018.
All research outputs
#7,537,497
of 22,997,544 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#3,758
of 7,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,776
of 79,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#10
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,997,544 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,702 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,338 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.