You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Senior physiotherapy students as standardised patients for junior students enhances self-efficacy and satisfaction in both junior and senior students
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Education, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6920-14-105 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Allison M Mandrusiak, Rosemary Isles, Angela T Chang, Nancy L Low Choy, Rowena Toppenberg, Donna McCook, Michelle D Smith, Karina O’Leary, Sandra G Brauer |
| Abstract |
Standardised patients are used in medical education to expose students to clinical contexts and facilitate transition to clinical practice, and this approach is gaining momentum in physiotherapy programs. Expense and availability of trained standardised patients are factors limiting widespread adoption, and accessing clinical visits with real patients can be challenging. This study addressed these issues by engaging senior students as standardised patients for junior students. It evaluated how this approach impacted self-reported constructs of both the junior and senior students. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 129 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 13% |
| Researcher | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 9% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 29 | 22% |
| Unknown | 34 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 6% |
| Psychology | 4 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Unknown | 43 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2014.
All research outputs
#18,372,841
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#2,732
of 3,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,059
of 226,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#45
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,305 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,329 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.