↓ Skip to main content

MALDI-TOF-MS serum protein profiling for developing diagnostic models and identifying serum markers for discogenic low back pain

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
MALDI-TOF-MS serum protein profiling for developing diagnostic models and identifying serum markers for discogenic low back pain
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-15-193
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yin-gang Zhang, Ren-qi Jiang, Tuan-Mao Guo, Shi-Xun Wu, Wei-Juan Ma

Abstract

The identification of the cause of chronic low back pain (CLBP) represents a great challenge to orthopedists due to the controversy over the diagnosis of discogenic low back pain (DLBP) and the existence of a number of cases of CLBP of unknown origin. This study aimed to develop diagnostic models to distinguish DLBP from other forms of CLBP and to identify serum biomarkers for DLBP.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 46 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 19%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Researcher 3 6%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 15 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Sports and Recreations 2 4%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 17 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2014.
All research outputs
#14,134,044
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#2,105
of 4,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,559
of 227,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#47
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,037 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,118 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.