You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparative genomics of Bradyrhizobium japonicum CPAC 15 and Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens CPAC 7: elite model strains for understanding symbiotic performance with soybean
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomics, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-15-420 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Arthur Fernandes Siqueira, Ernesto Ormeño-Orrillo, Rangel Celso Souza, Elisete Pains Rodrigues, Luiz Gonzaga Paula Almeida, Fernando Gomes Barcellos, Jesiane Stefânia Silva Batista, Andre Shigueyoshi Nakatani, Esperanza Martínez-Romero, Ana Tereza Ribeiro Vasconcelos, Mariangela Hungria |
| Abstract |
The soybean-Bradyrhizobium symbiosis can be highly efficient in fixing nitrogen, but few genomic sequences of elite inoculant strains are available. Here we contribute with information on the genomes of two commercial strains that are broadly applied to soybean crops in the tropics. B. japonicum CPAC 15 (=SEMIA 5079) is outstanding in its saprophytic capacity and competitiveness, whereas B. diazoefficiens CPAC 7 (=SEMIA 5080) is known for its high efficiency in fixing nitrogen. Both are well adapted to tropical soils. The genomes of CPAC 15 and CPAC 7 were compared to each other and also to those of B. japonicum USDA 6T and B. diazoefficiens USDA 110T. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 126 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 24% |
| Researcher | 25 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 8% |
| Unknown | 22 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 81 | 60% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 14% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 1% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 26 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2023.
All research outputs
#7,921,265
of 24,535,155 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#3,616
of 11,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,896
of 232,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#52
of 204 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,535,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,005 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,729 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 204 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.