↓ Skip to main content

Clinical features of childhood granulomatosis with polyangiitis (wegener’s granulomatosis)

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Rheumatology, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical features of childhood granulomatosis with polyangiitis (wegener’s granulomatosis)
Published in
Pediatric Rheumatology, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/1546-0096-12-18
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marek Bohm, Maria Isabel Gonzalez Fernandez, Seza Ozen, Angela Pistorio, Pavla Dolezalova, Paul Brogan, Giancarlo Barbano, Claudia Sengler, Marisa Klein-Gitelman, Pierre Quartier, Anders Fasth, Troels Herlin, Maria Teresa R A Terreri, Susan Nielsen, Marion A J van Rossum, Tadej Avcin, Esteban Rodolfo Castell, Ivan Foeldvari, Dirk Foell, Anuela Kondi, Isabelle Koné-Paut, Rolf-Michael Kuester, Hartmut Michels, Nico Wulffraat, Halima Ben Amer, Clara Malattia, Alberto Martini, Nicolino Ruperto, the Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation (PRINTO)

Abstract

Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA), formerly known as Wegener's granulomatosis (WG), belongs to the group of ANCA-associated necrotizing vasculitides. This study describes the clinical picture of the disease in a large cohort of GPA paediatric patients. Children with age at diagnosis ≤ 18 years, fulfilling the EULAR/PRINTO/PRES GPA/WG classification criteria were extracted from the PRINTO vasculitis database. The clinical signs/symptoms and laboratory features were analysed before or at the time of diagnosis and at least 3 months thereafter and compared with other paediatric and adult case series (>50 patients) derived from the literature.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 87 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 12 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 14%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Master 10 11%
Professor 5 6%
Other 22 25%
Unknown 16 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 61%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 18 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2014.
All research outputs
#4,165,117
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Rheumatology
#146
of 693 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,287
of 226,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Rheumatology
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 693 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,319 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them