↓ Skip to main content

Genome variations account for different response to three mineral elements between Medicago truncatula ecotypes Jemalong A17 and R108

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Plant Biology, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genome variations account for different response to three mineral elements between Medicago truncatula ecotypes Jemalong A17 and R108
Published in
BMC Plant Biology, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2229-14-122
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tian-Zuo Wang, Qiu-Ying Tian, Bao-Lan Wang, Min-Gui Zhao, Wen-Hao Zhang

Abstract

Resequencing can be used to identify genome variations underpinning many morphological and physiological phenotypes. Legume model plant Medicago truncatula ecotypes Jemalong A17 (J. A17) and R108 differ in their responses to mineral toxicity of aluminum and sodium, and mineral deficiency of iron in growth medium. The difference may result from their genome variations, but no experimental evidence supports this hypothesis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 32%
Student > Master 4 13%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 5 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 58%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 13%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2014.
All research outputs
#20,230,558
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from BMC Plant Biology
#2,503
of 3,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,294
of 227,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Plant Biology
#33
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,235 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,401 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.