↓ Skip to main content

Supported cognitive-behavioural self-help versus treatment-as-usual for depressed informal carers of stroke survivors (CEDArS): study protocol for a feasibility randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
303 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Supported cognitive-behavioural self-help versus treatment-as-usual for depressed informal carers of stroke survivors (CEDArS): study protocol for a feasibility randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-15-157
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joanne Woodford, Paul Farrand, Edward R Watkins, David A Richards, David J Llewellyn

Abstract

Increased life expectancy has resulted in a greater provision of informal care within the community for patients with chronic physical health conditions. Informal carers are at greater risk of poor mental health, with one in three informal carers of stroke survivors experiencing depression. However, currently no psychological treatments tailored to the unique needs of depressed informal carers of stroke survivors exist. Furthermore, informal carers of stroke survivors experience a number of barriers to attending traditional face-to-face psychological services, such as lack of time and the demands of the caring role. The increased flexibility associated with supported cognitive behavioral therapy self-help (CBTsh), such as the ability for support to be provided by telephone, email, or face-to-face, alongside shorter support sessions, may help overcome such barriers to access. CBTsh, tailored to depressed informal carers of stroke survivors may represent an effective and acceptable solution.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 303 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 302 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 47 16%
Researcher 39 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 12%
Student > Bachelor 30 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 7%
Other 50 17%
Unknown 78 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 59 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 56 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 47 16%
Social Sciences 14 5%
Neuroscience 10 3%
Other 27 9%
Unknown 90 30%