↓ Skip to main content

Using scenario tree modelling for targeted herd sampling to substantiate freedom from disease

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Veterinary Research, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using scenario tree modelling for targeted herd sampling to substantiate freedom from disease
Published in
BMC Veterinary Research, August 2011
DOI 10.1186/1746-6148-7-49
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah Blickenstorfer, Heinzpeter Schwermer, Monika Engels, Martin Reist, Marcus G Doherr, Daniela C Hadorn

Abstract

In order to optimise the cost-effectiveness of active surveillance to substantiate freedom from disease, a new approach using targeted sampling of farms was developed and applied on the example of infectious bovine rhinotracheitis (IBR) and enzootic bovine leucosis (EBL) in Switzerland. Relevant risk factors (RF) for the introduction of IBR and EBL into Swiss cattle farms were identified and their relative risks defined based on literature review and expert opinions. A quantitative model based on the scenario tree method was subsequently used to calculate the required sample size of a targeted sampling approach (TS) for a given sensitivity. We compared the sample size with that of a stratified random sample (sRS) with regard to efficiency.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 4%
Switzerland 3 4%
Brazil 2 3%
Japan 1 1%
Unknown 61 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 19%
Other 6 9%
Student > Master 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 11 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 36%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 14 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 10%
Mathematics 3 4%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 17 24%