You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A patient-centered network approach to multidisciplinary-guideline development: a process evaluation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-9-68 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elvira ME Den Breejen, Mirrian AHW Hilbink, Willianne LDM Nelen, Tjerk J Wiersma, Jako S Burgers, Jan AM Kremer, Rosella PMG Hermens |
| Abstract |
Guideline development and uptake are still suboptimal; they focus on clinical aspects of diseases rather than on improving the integration of care. We used a patient-centered network approach to develop five harmonized guidelines (one multidisciplinary and four monodisciplinary) around clinical pathways in fertility care. We assessed the feasibility of this approach with a detailed process evaluation of the guideline development, professionals' experiences, and time invested. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 4 | 21% |
| Canada | 3 | 16% |
| United States | 2 | 11% |
| South Africa | 1 | 5% |
| Portugal | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 68% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 11% |
| Scientists | 2 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Peru | 2 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 80 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 16% |
| Unknown | 20 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 12% |
| Psychology | 7 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 26 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2015.
All research outputs
#2,367,827
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#521
of 1,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,488
of 229,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#5
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,728 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.