↓ Skip to main content

Understanding processes of risk and protection that shape the sexual and reproductive health of young women affected by conflict: the price of protection

Overview of attention for article published in Conflict and Health, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Understanding processes of risk and protection that shape the sexual and reproductive health of young women affected by conflict: the price of protection
Published in
Conflict and Health, August 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13031-017-0117-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aisha Hutchinson, Philippa Waterhouse, Jane March-McDonald, Sarah Neal, Roger Ingham

Abstract

It is assumed that knowing what puts young women at risk of poor sexual health outcomes and, in turn, what protects them against these outcomes, will enable greater targeted protection as well as help in designing more effective programmes. Accordingly, efforts have been directed towards mapping risk and protective factors onto general ecological frameworks, but these currently do not take into account the context of modern armed conflict. A literature overview approach was used to identify SRH related risk and protective factors specifically for young women affected by modern armed conflict. A range of keywords were used to identify academic articles which explored the sexual and reproductive health needs of young women affected by modern armed conflict. Selected articles were read to identify risk and protective factors in relation to sexual and reproductive health. While no articles explicitly identified 'risk' or 'protective' factors, we were able to extrapolate these through a thorough engagement with the text. However, we found that it was difficult to identify factors as either 'risky' or 'protective', with many having the capacity to be both risky and protective (i.e. refugee camps or family). Therefore, using an ecological model, six environments that impact upon young women's lives in contexts of modern armed conflict are used to illustrate the dynamic and complex operation of risk and protection - highlighting processes of protection and the 'trade-offs' between risks. We conclude that there are no simple formulaic risk/protection patterns to be applied in every conflict and post-conflict context. Instead, there needs to be greater recognition of the 'processes' of protection, including the role of 'trade-offs' (what we term as 'protection at a price'), in order to further effective policy and practical responses to improve sexual and reproductive health outcomes during or following armed conflict. Focus on specific 'factors' (such as 'female headed household') takes attention away from the processes through which factors manifest themselves and which often determine whether the factor will later be considered 'risk inducing' or protective.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 84 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 17%
Researcher 12 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 30 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 20 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 11%
Psychology 6 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 1%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 30 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2021.
All research outputs
#13,052,327
of 22,997,544 outputs
Outputs from Conflict and Health
#492
of 577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,980
of 318,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conflict and Health
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,997,544 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.2. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,832 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.