You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The feeding practices and structure questionnaire: construction and initial validation in a sample of Australian first-time mothers and their 2-year olds
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1479-5868-11-72 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elena Jansen, Kimberley M Mallan, Jan M Nicholson, Lynne A Daniels |
| Abstract |
Early feeding practices lay the foundation for children's eating habits and weight gain. Questionnaires are available to assess parental feeding but overlapping and inconsistent items, subscales and terminology limit conceptual clarity and between study comparisons. Our aim was to consolidate a range of existing items into a parsimonious and conceptually robust questionnaire for assessing feeding practices with very young children (<3 years). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 263 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 259 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 42 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 12% |
| Researcher | 24 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 46 | 17% |
| Unknown | 69 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 62 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 18% |
| Psychology | 30 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 25 | 10% |
| Unknown | 76 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2016.
All research outputs
#12,839,523
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#1,634
of 1,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,960
of 228,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#27
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,925 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.4. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,065 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.