You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Participatory eHealth development to support nurses in antimicrobial stewardship
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6947-14-45 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jobke Wentzel, Lex van Velsen, Maarten van Limburg, Nienke de Jong, Joyce Karreman, Ron Hendrix, Julia Julia Elisabeth Wilhelmina Cornelia van Gemert-Pijnen |
| Abstract |
Antimicrobial resistance poses a threat to patient safety worldwide. To stop antimicrobial resistance, Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs (ASPs; programs for optimizing antimicrobial use), need to be implemented. Within these programs, nurses are important actors, as they put antimicrobial treatment into effect. To optimally support nurses in ASPs, they should have access to information that supports them in their preparation, administration and monitoring tasks. In addition, it should help them to detect possible risks or adverse events associated with antimicrobial therapy. In this formative study, we investigate how nurses' can be supported in ASPs by means of an eHealth intervention that targets their information needs. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 20% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 20% |
| Mexico | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 166 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 37 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 11% |
| Researcher | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 33 | 19% |
| Unknown | 48 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 8% |
| Psychology | 11 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 32 | 19% |
| Unknown | 50 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2014.
All research outputs
#7,097,680
of 24,942,536 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#649
of 2,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,189
of 233,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#8
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,942,536 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,118 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,557 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.