↓ Skip to main content

Mutation analysis of genes in the EGFR pathway in Head and Neck cancer patients: implications for anti-EGFR treatment response

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mutation analysis of genes in the EGFR pathway in Head and Neck cancer patients: implications for anti-EGFR treatment response
Published in
BMC Research Notes, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/1756-0500-7-337
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carolien Boeckx, Christine Weyn, Isabelle Vanden Bempt, Vanessa Deschoolmeester, An Wouters, Pol Specenier, Carl Van Laer, Danielle Van den Weyngaert, Mark Kockx, Jan B Vermorken, Marc Peeters, Patrick Pauwels, Filip Lardon, Marc Baay

Abstract

Targeted therapy against the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) is among the most promising molecular therapeutics for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC). However, drug resistance limits the clinical efficacy of anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies and no predictive biomarker has entered the clinic yet.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 15%
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Other 4 9%
Other 12 26%
Unknown 6 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 43%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 13%
Computer Science 2 4%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 7 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2014.
All research outputs
#13,409,581
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#1,681
of 4,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,013
of 228,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#44
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,262 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,065 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.