↓ Skip to main content

Brain–kidney crosstalk

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
28 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
121 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Brain–kidney crosstalk
Published in
Critical Care, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/cc13907
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arkom Nongnuch, Kwanpeemai Panorchan, Andrew Davenport

Abstract

Encephalopathy and altered higher mental functions are common clinical complications of acute kidney injury. Although sepsis is a major triggering factor, acute kidney injury predisposes to confusion by causing generalised inflammation, leading to increased permeability of the blood-brain barrier, exacerbated by hyperosmolarity and metabolic acidosis due to the retention of products of nitrogen metabolism potentially resulting in increased brain water content. Downregulation of cell membrane transporters predisposes to alterations in neurotransmitter secretion and uptake, coupled with drug accumulation increasing the risk of encephalopathy. On the other hand, acute brain injury can induce a variety of changes in renal function ranging from altered function and electrolyte imbalances to inflammatory changes in brain death kidney donors.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Unknown 132 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 16%
Other 12 9%
Student > Master 12 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 8%
Student > Postgraduate 11 8%
Other 31 23%
Unknown 37 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 71 52%
Neuroscience 7 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 1%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 1%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 37 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2015.
All research outputs
#2,408,303
of 26,450,612 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,069
of 6,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,673
of 242,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#20
of 149 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,450,612 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,719 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,947 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 149 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.