You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Factors affecting motivation and retention of primary health care workers in three disparate regions in Kenya
|
---|---|
Published in |
Human Resources for Health, June 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1478-4491-12-33 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
David Ojakaa, Susan Olango, Jordan Jarvis |
Abstract |
The World Health Organization (WHO) and the Government of Kenya alike identify a well-performing health workforce as key to attaining better health. Nevertheless, the motivation and retention of health care workers (HCWs) persist as challenges. This study investigated factors influencing motivation and retention of HCWs at primary health care facilities in three different settings in Kenya - the remote area of Turkana, the relatively accessible region of Machakos, and the disadvantaged informal urban settlement of Kibera in Nairobi. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 25% |
Kenya | 1 | 13% |
Denmark | 1 | 13% |
Canada | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 528 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
Kenya | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Peru | 1 | <1% |
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
Romania | 1 | <1% |
Other | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 518 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 137 | 26% |
Researcher | 45 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 45 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 40 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 35 | 7% |
Other | 96 | 18% |
Unknown | 130 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 129 | 24% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 69 | 13% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 46 | 9% |
Social Sciences | 46 | 9% |
Psychology | 13 | 2% |
Other | 79 | 15% |
Unknown | 146 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2014.
All research outputs
#7,301,979
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
#763
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,880
of 242,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
#16
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,856 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.