You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Nutritional profile of Indian vegetarian diets – the Indian Migration Study (IMS)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-13-55 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Krithiga Shridhar, Preet Kaur Dhillon, Liza Bowen, Sanjay Kinra, Ankalmadugu Venkatsubbareddy Bharathi, Dorairaj Prabhakaran, Kolli Srinath Reddy, Shah Ebrahim |
| Abstract |
The cardiovascular and other health benefits and potential harms of protein and micronutrient deficiency of vegetarian diets continue to be debated. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 16% |
| Brazil | 3 | 6% |
| Belgium | 2 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 27 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 37 | 74% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 14% |
| Scientists | 6 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 249 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 245 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 55 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 48 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 11% |
| Researcher | 22 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 29 | 12% |
| Unknown | 53 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 64 | 26% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 35 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 27 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 37 | 15% |
| Unknown | 64 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2023.
All research outputs
#921,286
of 25,791,949 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#266
of 1,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,593
of 243,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#14
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,949 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,529 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,048 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.