↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of simplified acute physiology score 3 performance: a systematic review of external validation studies

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of simplified acute physiology score 3 performance: a systematic review of external validation studies
Published in
Critical Care, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/cc13911
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antonio Paulo Nassar, LuizMarcelo Sa Malbouisson, Rui Moreno

Abstract

Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 (SAPS 3) was the first critical care prognostic model developed from worldwide data. We aimed to systematically review studies that assessed the prognostic performance of SAPS 3 general and customized models for predicting hospital mortality in adult patients admitted to the ICU.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
Portugal 1 1%
Austria 1 1%
Sudan 1 1%
Unknown 89 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 12 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 12%
Researcher 11 12%
Student > Master 10 11%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 21 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 23 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2014.
All research outputs
#15,170,530
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,987
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,810
of 242,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#96
of 149 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,856 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 149 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.