↓ Skip to main content

Maternal mortality in the informal settlements of Nairobi city: what do we know?

Overview of attention for article published in Reproductive Health, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
242 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Maternal mortality in the informal settlements of Nairobi city: what do we know?
Published in
Reproductive Health, April 2009
DOI 10.1186/1742-4755-6-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Abdhalah Kasiira Ziraba, Nyovani Madise, Samuel Mills, Catherine Kyobutungi, Alex Ezeh

Abstract

Current estimates of maternal mortality ratios in Kenya are at least as high as 560 deaths per 100,000 live births. Given the pervasive poverty and lack of quality health services in slum areas, the maternal mortality situation in this setting can only be expected to be worse. With a functioning health care system, most maternal deaths are avoidable if complications are identified early. A major challenge to effective monitoring of maternal mortality in developing countries is the lack of reliable data since vital registration systems are either non-existent or under-utilized. In this paper, we estimated the burden and identified causes of maternal mortality in two slums of Nairobi City, Kenya.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 242 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 3 1%
Canada 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Nigeria 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 229 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 64 26%
Researcher 41 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 10%
Student > Bachelor 22 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 7%
Other 46 19%
Unknown 27 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 75 31%
Social Sciences 51 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 2%
Other 30 12%
Unknown 31 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2022.
All research outputs
#2,264,006
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Health
#226
of 1,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,263
of 93,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Health
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,406 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them