↓ Skip to main content

Chlorella for protein and biofuels: from strain selection to outdoor cultivation in a Green Wall Panel photobioreactor

Overview of attention for article published in Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
171 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
387 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chlorella for protein and biofuels: from strain selection to outdoor cultivation in a Green Wall Panel photobioreactor
Published in
Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/1754-6834-7-84
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alessia Guccione, Natascia Biondi, Giacomo Sampietro, Liliana Rodolfi, Niccolò Bassi, Mario R Tredici

Abstract

Chlorella is one of the few microalgae employed for human consumption. It typically has a high protein content, but it can also accumulate high amounts of lipids or carbohydrates under stress conditions and, for this reason, it is of interest in the production of biofuels. High production costs and energy consumption are associated with its cultivation. This work describes a strategy to reduce costs and environmental impact of Chlorella biomass production for food, biofuels and other applications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 387 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 375 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 70 18%
Student > Bachelor 55 14%
Researcher 45 12%
Student > Master 44 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 4%
Other 43 11%
Unknown 114 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 99 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 32 8%
Engineering 31 8%
Environmental Science 22 6%
Chemical Engineering 21 5%
Other 44 11%
Unknown 138 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2019.
All research outputs
#2,011,736
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts
#73
of 1,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,617
of 243,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts
#1
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,579 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,323 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.