You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
H.U.B city steps: methods and early findings from a community-based participatory research trial to reduce blood pressure among african americans
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, June 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1479-5868-8-59 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jamie M Zoellner, Carol C Connell, Michael B Madson, Bo Wang, Vickie Blakely Reed, Elaine Fontenot Molaison, Kathleen Yadrick |
| Abstract |
Community-based participatory research (CBPR) has been recognized as an important approach to develop and execute health interventions among marginalized populations, and a key strategy to translate research into practice to help reduce health disparities. Despite growing interest in the CBPR approach, CBPR initiatives rarely use experimental or other rigorous research designs to evaluate health outcomes. This behavioral study describes the conceptual frameworks, methods, and early findings related to the reach, adoption, implementation, and effectiveness on primary blood pressure outcomes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 230 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 217 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 42 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 15% |
| Researcher | 26 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 8% |
| Other | 52 | 23% |
| Unknown | 34 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 63 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 36 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 30 | 13% |
| Psychology | 26 | 11% |
| Sports and Recreations | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 9% |
| Unknown | 42 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2011.
All research outputs
#15,233,109
of 22,649,029 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#1,768
of 1,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,106
of 112,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#8
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,649,029 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,913 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.4. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,808 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.