↓ Skip to main content

Building resiliency: a cross-sectional study examining relationships among health-related quality of life, well-being, and disaster preparedness

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
305 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Building resiliency: a cross-sectional study examining relationships among health-related quality of life, well-being, and disaster preparedness
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/1477-7525-12-85
Pubmed ID
Authors

Monica E Gowan, Ray C Kirk, Jeff A Sloan

Abstract

Worldwide, disaster exposure and consequences are rising. Disaster risk in New Zealand is amplified by island geography, isolation, and ubiquitous natural hazards. Wellington, the capital city, has vital needs for evacuation preparedness and resilience to the devastating impacts and increasing uncertainties of earthquake and tsunami disasters. While poor quality of life (QoL) is widely-associated with low levels of engagement in many health-protective behaviors, the relationships among health-related quality of life (HrQoL), well-being, and preparedness are virtually unknown.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 305 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
New Zealand 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 292 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 12%
Student > Bachelor 36 12%
Researcher 26 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 8%
Other 64 21%
Unknown 75 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 45 15%
Social Sciences 39 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 37 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 30 10%
Engineering 14 5%
Other 52 17%
Unknown 88 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,754,688
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#94
of 2,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,099
of 243,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#2
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.