You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Development and validation of the ACE tool: assessing medical trainees’ competency in evidence based medicine
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Education, June 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6920-14-114 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Dragan Ilic, Rusli Bin Nordin, Paul Glasziou, Julie K Tilson, Elmer Villanueva |
Abstract |
While a variety of instruments have been developed to assess knowledge and skills in evidence based medicine (EBM), few assess all aspects of EBM - including knowledge, skills attitudes and behaviour - or have been psychometrically evaluated. The aim of this study was to develop and validate an instrument that evaluates medical trainees' competency in EBM across knowledge, skills and attitude. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 3 | 23% |
Colombia | 2 | 15% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 15% |
Italy | 1 | 8% |
United States | 1 | 8% |
Spain | 1 | 8% |
Canada | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 2 | 15% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 62% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 31% |
Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 107 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 14 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 11% |
Lecturer | 9 | 8% |
Researcher | 8 | 7% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 7% |
Other | 42 | 38% |
Unknown | 18 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 43% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 11% |
Social Sciences | 8 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
Other | 15 | 14% |
Unknown | 21 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2014.
All research outputs
#4,165,214
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#697
of 3,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,434
of 228,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#11
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,305 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,827 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.