↓ Skip to main content

An integrated platform for bovine DNA methylome analysis suitable for small samples

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An integrated platform for bovine DNA methylome analysis suitable for small samples
Published in
BMC Genomics, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-15-451
Pubmed ID
Authors

Habib A Shojaei Saadi, Alan M O’Doherty, Dominic Gagné, Éric Fournier, Jason R Grant, Marc-André Sirard, Claude Robert

Abstract

Oocytes and early embryos contain minute amounts of DNA, RNA and proteins, making the study of early mammalian development highly challenging. The study of the embryo epigenome, in particular the DNA methylome, has been made accessible thanks to the possibility of amplifying specific sequences according to their initial methylation status. This paper describes a novel platform dedicated to the genome-wide study of bovine DNA methylation, including a complete pipeline for data analysis and visualization. The platform allows processing and integrating of DNA methylome and transcriptome data from the same sample. Procedures were optimized for genome-wide analysis of 10 ng of DNA (10 bovine blastocysts). Bovine sperm and blastocysts were compared as a test of platform capability.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 70 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 7%
Other 15 21%
Unknown 14 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 18%
Engineering 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 15 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2016.
All research outputs
#3,669,981
of 23,321,213 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#1,380
of 10,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,245
of 230,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#20
of 209 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,321,213 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,742 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,210 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 209 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.