↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: International workshop on insecticide resistance in vectors of arboviruses, December 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Erratum to: International workshop on insecticide resistance in vectors of arboviruses, December 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, August 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13071-017-2327-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vincent Corbel, Dina M. Fonseca, David Weetman, João Pinto, Nicole L. Achee, Fabrice Chandre, Mamadou B. Coulibaly, Isabelle Dusfour, John Grieco, Waraporn Juntarajumnong, Audrey Lenhart, Ademir J. Martins, Catherine Moyes, Lee Ching Ng, Kamaraju Raghavendra, Hassan Vatandoost, John Vontas, Pie Muller, Shinji Kasai, Florence Fouque, Raman Velayudhan, Claire Durot, Jean-Philippe David

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 19%
Student > Postgraduate 6 14%
Unspecified 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 9 21%
Unknown 9 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 14%
Unspecified 4 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Other 12 28%
Unknown 9 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2017.
All research outputs
#18,154,932
of 23,322,258 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#3,893
of 5,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,772
of 318,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#90
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,322,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,553 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,405 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.