↓ Skip to main content

Transcriptome profiling of granulosa cells of bovine ovarian follicles during growth from small to large antral sizes

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Transcriptome profiling of granulosa cells of bovine ovarian follicles during growth from small to large antral sizes
Published in
BMC Genomics, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-15-24
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicholas Hatzirodos, Helen F Irving-Rodgers, Katja Hummitzsch, Margaret L Harland, Stephanie E Morris, Raymond J Rodgers

Abstract

At later stages of folliculogenesis, the mammalian ovarian follicle contains layers of epithelial granulosa cells surrounding an antral cavity. During follicle development granulosa cells replicate, secrete hormones and support the growth of the oocyte. In cattle, the follicle needs to grow > 10 mm in diameter to allow an oocyte to ovulate, following which the granulosa cells cease dividing and differentiate into the specialised cells of the corpus luteum. To better understand the molecular basis of follicular growth and granulosa cell maturation, we undertook transcriptome profiling of granulosa cells from small (< 5 mm; n = 10) and large (> 10 mm, n = 4) healthy bovine follicles using Affymetrix microarrays (24,128 probe sets).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 85 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 25%
Researcher 21 24%
Student > Master 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 4%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 12 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 16%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 9 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 21 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2016.
All research outputs
#14,196,917
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#5,690
of 10,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,798
of 306,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#238
of 447 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,637 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 447 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.