↓ Skip to main content

Body image in head and neck cancer patients treated with radiotherapy: the impact of surgical procedures

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Body image in head and neck cancer patients treated with radiotherapy: the impact of surgical procedures
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, August 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12955-017-0740-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tsung-Min Hung, Ching-Rong Lin, Yu-Chun Chi, Chien-Yu Lin, Eric Yen-Chao Chen, Chung-Jan Kang, Shiang-Fu Huang, Yeong-Yuh Juang, Chun-Yu Huang, Joseph Tung-Chieh Chang

Abstract

In this study, we aimed to investigate the impact of surgical procedures on the body image of head and neck cancer patients treated with radiotherapy and with or without radical surgery. A cross-sectional survey of 150 patients with head and neck cancer was conducted. Sixty patients had nasopharyngeal cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy without surgery, and 90 patients had oral cavity cancer treated with radical surgery plus adjuvant radiotherapy. All participants completed a 10-item Body Image Scale (BIS) questionnaire to assess body image dissatisfaction. Among all patients, the socio-demographic and clinical variables were age, gender, partnership, education, employment, and radical surgery. In surgically-treated patients, the clinical variables were facial skin sacrificed, mouth angle sacrificed, glossectomy, maxillectomy, and mandibulectomy. ANOVAs, t-tests, and multiple regressions were used to evaluate the relationships between these variables and BIS results. In all patients, radical surgery was the strongest independent predictor of BIS scores. Surgically-treated patients had significantly worse BIS scores than the patients without surgery. In surgically-treated patients, facial skin sacrificed, mouth angle sacrificed, maxillectomy, and mandibulectomy were significantly associated with body image. According to multivariable analyses, inferior maxillectomy and segmental mandibulectomy were independent prognosticators of a poor BIS score in surgically-treated patients. Radical surgery for head and neck cancer patients has a significant impact on their body image, especially for those undergoing facial bone destructive surgery.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 17%
Researcher 7 12%
Other 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Other 11 18%
Unknown 15 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 28%
Psychology 6 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Sports and Recreations 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 19 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2019.
All research outputs
#13,332,723
of 22,999,744 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#1,049
of 2,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,435
of 317,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#22
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,999,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,186 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,355 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.