You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Evolution of plant senescence
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Ecology and Evolution, July 2009
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2148-9-163 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Howard Thomas, Lin Huang, Mike Young, Helen Ougham |
Abstract |
Senescence is integral to the flowering plant life-cycle. Senescence-like processes occur also in non-angiosperm land plants, algae and photosynthetic prokaryotes. Increasing numbers of genes have been assigned functions in the regulation and execution of angiosperm senescence. At the same time there has been a large expansion in the number and taxonomic spread of plant sequences in the genome databases. The present paper uses these resources to make a study of the evolutionary origins of angiosperm senescence based on a survey of the distribution, across plant and microbial taxa, and expression of senescence-related genes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 7 | 3% |
United States | 4 | 2% |
France | 2 | <1% |
Italy | 2 | <1% |
Colombia | 2 | <1% |
Mexico | 2 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
India | 1 | <1% |
Romania | 1 | <1% |
Other | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 180 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 48 | 24% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 44 | 22% |
Student > Master | 20 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 15 | 7% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 15 | 7% |
Other | 39 | 19% |
Unknown | 22 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 143 | 70% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 7% |
Environmental Science | 5 | 2% |
Engineering | 2 | <1% |
Chemistry | 2 | <1% |
Other | 8 | 4% |
Unknown | 28 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2015.
All research outputs
#16,061,963
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#2,697
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,820
of 122,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#42
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,412 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.