↓ Skip to main content

Using routinely recorded data in the UK to assess outcomes in a randomised controlled trial: The Trials of Access

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
99 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using routinely recorded data in the UK to assess outcomes in a randomised controlled trial: The Trials of Access
Published in
Trials, August 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13063-017-2135-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

G. A. Powell, L. J. Bonnett, C. Tudur-Smith, D. A. Hughes, P. R. Williamson, A. G. Marson

Abstract

In the UK, routinely recorded data may benefit prospective studies including randomised controlled trials (RCTs). In an on-going study, we aim to assess the feasibility of access and agreement of routinely recorded clinical and non-clinical data compared to data collected during a RCT using standard prospective methods. This paper will summarise available UK routinely recorded data sources and discuss our experience with the feasibility of accessing routinely recorded data for participants of a RCT before finally proposing recommendations for improving the access and implementation of routinely recorded data in RCTs. Setting: the case study RCT is the Standard and New Antiepileptic Drugs II (SANAD II) trial, a pragmatic, UK, multicentre, phase IV RCT assessing the clinical and cost-effectiveness of antiepileptic drug treatments for newly diagnosed epilepsy. 98 participants have provided written consent to permit the request of routinely recorded data. Study procedures: routinely recorded clinical and non-clinical data were identified and data requested through formal applications from available data holders for the duration that participants have been recruited into SANAD II. The feasibility of accessing routinely recorded data during a RCT is assessed and recommendations for improving access proposed. Secondary-care clinical and socioeconomic data is recorded on a national basis and can be accessed, although there are limitations in the application process. Primary-care data are recorded by a number of organisations on a de-identified basis but access for specific individuals has not been feasible. Access to data recorded by non-clinical sources, including The Department for Work and Pensions and The Driving and Vehicle Licensing Agency, was not successful. Recommendations discussed include further research to assess the attributes of routinely recorded data, an assessment of public perceptions and the development of strategies to collaboratively improve access to routinely recorded data for research. International Standard Randomised Controlled Trials, ISRCTN30294119 . Registered on 3 July 2012. EudraCT No: 2012-001884-64. Registered on 9 May 2012.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 99 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 81 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 15%
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Professor 3 4%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 23 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Computer Science 3 4%
Psychology 3 4%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 28 35%