↓ Skip to main content

New clade of enigmatic early archosaurs yields insights into early pseudosuchian phylogeny and the biogeography of the archosaur radiation

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
16 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
New clade of enigmatic early archosaurs yields insights into early pseudosuchian phylogeny and the biogeography of the archosaur radiation
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-14-128
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard J Butler, Corwin Sullivan, Martín D Ezcurra, Jun Liu, Agustina Lecuona, Roland B Sookias

Abstract

The origin and early radiation of archosaurs and closely related taxa (Archosauriformes) during the Triassic was a critical event in the evolutionary history of tetrapods. This radiation led to the dinosaur-dominated ecosystems of the Jurassic and Cretaceous, and the high present-day archosaur diversity that includes around 10,000 bird and crocodylian species. The timing and dynamics of this evolutionary radiation are currently obscured by the poorly constrained phylogenetic positions of several key early archosauriform taxa, including several species from the Middle Triassic of Argentina (Gracilisuchus stipanicicorum) and China (Turfanosuchus dabanensis, Yonghesuchus sangbiensis). These species act as unstable 'wildcards' in morphological phylogenetic analyses, reducing phylogenetic resolution.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Chile 1 1%
France 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Argentina 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 65 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 17%
Student > Bachelor 10 14%
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 18 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 36%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 19 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 19 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,859,694
of 25,587,485 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#756
of 3,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,771
of 244,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#15
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,587,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,717 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,576 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.