↓ Skip to main content

Standardization and performance evaluation of mononuclear cell cytokine secretion assays in a multicenter study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Immunology, December 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Standardization and performance evaluation of mononuclear cell cytokine secretion assays in a multicenter study
Published in
BMC Immunology, December 2006
DOI 10.1186/1471-2172-7-29
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wayne G Shreffler, Cynthia M Visness, Melissa Burger, William W Cruikshank, Howard M Lederman, Maite de la Morena, Kristine Grindle, Agustin Calatroni, Hugh A Sampson, James E Gern

Abstract

Cryopreservation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells has been used to preserve and standardize immunologic measurements for multicenter studies, however, effects of cryopreservation on cytokine responses are incompletely understood. In designing immunologic studies for a new multicenter birth cohort study of childhood asthma, we performed a series of experiments to determine the effects of two different methods of cryopreservation on the cytokine responses of cord and peripheral blood mononuclear cells.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 2%
Belgium 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 38 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 43%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 14%
Student > Master 4 10%
Other 3 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 4 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 31%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 4 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2016.
All research outputs
#6,405,869
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from BMC Immunology
#105
of 585 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,587
of 156,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Immunology
#7
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 585 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,257 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.